|
RubiStar |
Rubric Made Using:
RubiStar ( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )
>> To save this document onto your
computer, please choose File :: Save As from your Browser
Menu. |
|
|
CATEGORY |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
Information |
All information presented in the debate was clear,
accurate and thorough. |
Most information presented in the debate was clear,
accurate and thorough. |
Most information presented in the debate was clear and
accurate, but was not usually thorough. |
Information had several inaccuracies OR was usually
not clear. |
|
Use of Facts/Statistics |
Every major point was well supported with several
relevant facts, statistics and/or examples. |
Every major point was adequately supported with
relevant facts, statistics and/or examples. |
Every major point was supported with facts, statistics
and/or examples, but the relevance of some was questionable. |
Every point was not supported. |
|
Organization |
All arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise)
and organized in a tight, logical fashion. |
Most arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise)
and organized in a tight, logical fashion. |
All arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise)
but the organization was sometimes not clear or logical. |
Arguments were not clearly tied to an idea (premise).
|
|
Understanding of Topic |
The team clearly understood the topic in-depth and
presented their information forcefully and convincingly. |
The team clearly undestood the topic in-depth and
presented their information with ease. |
The team seemed to understand the main points of the
topic and presented those with ease. |
The team did not show an adequate understanding of the
topic. |
|
Respect for Other Team |
All statements, body language, and responses were
respectful and were in appropriate language. |
Statements and responses were respectful and used
appropriate language, but once or twice body language was not. |
Most statements and responses were respectful and in
appropriate language, but there was one sarcastic remark. |
Statements, responses and/or body language were
consistently not respectful. |
| © 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 High Plains Regional Technology in Education Consortium HPR*TEC |