Reviewed by: Adam
Click here for our grading scale.
Navigation:

Navigation around this site is pretty sloppy, probably because there is
nearly nothing on the home page. Instead there are a
ton of links crammed to the left side of it with a scroll bar
to see all of them; needless to say, there are more links than what are
necessary.
For example, there is a link that lists all of King's books (all of
which are linked), a link to sites about his books, a link that
provides titles of all
of his movies, and another link that provides links to other Stephen
King sites. I truely feel
that I did not need to say the word "link" that many times in one
sentence. Why were there two seperate links
for his books, and why were there no links to any sites about his
movies? Furthermore, couldn't most, if not all of those
links
have been under one link down that left hand column? Finally, we
agreed that there should have been some sort of link
on the home page; whether it gives information about the creator of the
page, or just links to some kind of secondary page.
Therefore, there was tons of information on this site, but the
way that it was put together just seemed that quality took
a back seat to what was
easiest to do.
Design:


The design for this site didn't turn out as bad as I first
thought that it would. It was pretty consistant on its
background color and scheme throughout the
site, and the list on the left hand side was done vertically instead of
horizontally, and wasn;t mixed at all between the
two. There was one glaring problem wrong with the site,
however. According to Spiderpro,
pages should
not be crammed to one sode of a page. As I mentioned on
navigation, everything was stuffed over to the left
side of the page, making the main part of
the page look empty and pathetic.
Visual Presentation:
As far as visual presentation,
there really wasn't much.. All
images were in the left hand column--one for each link. This
just seemed to make the list that much
longer. As for the background, it is solid black with a pattern
of red drops which I assume are suppossed to be blood. Not
much
else to say about this. Apparently images just weren't important
to whoever made this site.There is really nothing that can be
said about the visuals of this site except that maybe every
link has a picture to go along with it. There was nothing on the
site that especially caught my or entertained me while visiting.
Content:


The content for this site
could have been much worse. It
wasn't anything outstanding, but it definitely could have
been much
worse. The grammar and spelling were all good and the site is loaded
with information about Stephen King, which is good, and assuming
that
the site's audience is King nuts, then it is geared toward them.
However, Spiderpro
says to always use the first page and put some
information on it, which this site didn't really do. also, the creator
of the site gives his e-mail sit for people to give
feedback, but he seems to go out of his way to get not to, saying that
he rarely updates the site, so if you email him, he
might not respond.
Overall:

Overall, this site wasn't all
that great. The
maker of the site seemed to take the easy way to do the
site instead of doing it the
right way. He took a ton of links and just crammed them to the
left side of that pageand called it a website. I doubt that it
was bad because the
creator didn't know what he was doing, it was bad because he was lazy
while doing it.Thank
goodness for the design and
content areas, otherwise this could have been just a 1 Johnny site.
Overall,
this site wasn't all that great. The
maker of the site seemed to take the easy way to do the
site instead of doing it the
right way. He took a ton of links and just crammed them to the
left side of that pageand called it a website. I
doubt that it was bad because the
creator didn't know what he was doing, it was bad because he was lazy
while doing it. Thank goodness for the design and
content areas, otherwise this could have been just a 1 Johnny site.
Home